The Rolex Daytona, a watch synonymous with motorsport and luxury, has undergone several iterations throughout its history. Understanding the specifications, particularly the thickness, of a specific model year, such as the 2016 Daytona, is crucial for collectors and enthusiasts alike. This article delves into the thickness of the 2016 Rolex Daytona, comparing it to previous and subsequent models, and exploring the broader context of Rolex Daytona dimensions and variations. We will also touch upon related topics such as the differences between reference numbers 116500 and 126500, lug size, dial size, and overall specifications.
The 2016 Rolex Daytona: A Year of Transition
2016 marked a significant year for the Rolex Daytona, representing a transitional period between different reference numbers and movements. While the exact thickness can vary slightly depending on manufacturing tolerances, the 2016 models generally fall within a specific range. Pinpointing the precise thickness without knowing the specific reference number (e.g., 116500LN or a specific variation within the 116500 series) is difficult. However, understanding the general dimensions of the Daytona models around this period helps to contextualize the thickness.
The primary Daytona models available in 2016 were largely based on the reference 116500, which succeeded the earlier 116520. The 116500 featured a significant update: the in-house calibre 4130 movement, replacing the Zenith El Primero movement used in previous generations. This movement change contributed to some variations in the overall case dimensions, including thickness. The 116500LN (LN denoting the black ceramic bezel) was a particularly popular model.
Rolex Daytona 116500 vs 126500: A Comparison of Thickness and Other Dimensions
The transition from the 116500 to the 126500, which appeared later, further complicates the discussion of thickness. While both models share the same basic design philosophy, there are subtle differences. The 126500, introduced later, features the updated calibre 4131 movement, incorporating a chronograph module integrated directly into the movement. This design change, while not drastically altering the visual profile, subtly impacts the thickness. Generally speaking, the 126500 is considered slightly thinner than the 116500, though the difference is minimal and may not be immediately noticeable without side-by-side comparison.
The difference in thickness between the 116500 and 126500 is often cited as being around 0.5mm to 1mm, but this varies depending on the specific configuration and measurement methods. Other dimensions, like the case diameter (40mm for both), are consistent across both models. The lug size, which contributes to the overall wearability and feel on the wrist, is also essentially the same.
Rolex Lug Size Chart: Understanding the Impact on Wearability
current url：https://vbvmuo.e538c.com/all/rolex-daytona-2016-thickness-58767